Tesis

Validasi Instrumen Evaluasi Kinerja Instruktur Laboratorium Keterampilan Klinik = Validation of Evaluating Clinical SkillsLab Teacher’s Didactical Performance Instrument.

Latar Belakang: Instruktur keterampilan klinik merupakan ujung tombak dalam proses belajar mengajar keterampilan klinik dasar. Peran instruktur keterampilan klinik sangat penting dalam membimbing mahasiswa berlatih keterampilan klinik, memfasilitasi, memastikan kemajuan keterampilannya serta mempersiapkan mahasiswa mencapai kompetensinya sebagai seorang dokter. Evaluating Clinical Skillslab Teacher’s Didactical Performance Instrument disusun berdasarkan telaah literatur tentang strategi efektif atau aspek dalam melatih keterampilan di laboratorium keterampilan klinik guna mengevaluasi kinerja instruktur laboratorium keterampilan klinik. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah melakukan validasi Evaluating Clinical Skillslab Teacher’s Didactical Performance Instrument adaptasi Bahasa Indonesia. Metode: Penelitian ini menggunakan desain penelitian potong lintang yang dilakukan di Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jakarta pada bulan Mei 2015 dengan melibatkan 457 mahasiswa semester 2,4 dan 6. Responden melakukan pengisian kuesioner Evaluating Clinical Skillslab Teacher’s Didactical Performance Instrument yang sebelumnya telah terjemahkan ke dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Data yang diperoleh dari kuesioner dianalisis untuk mengkonfirmasi valid dan reliabel. Hasil: Sebanyak 387 mahasiswa terlibat dalam penelitian ini (tingkat respon 84,68%). Terdapat 1 butir pernyataan yang dikeluarkan (drop out) karena validitasnya rendah. Dua faktor yaitu, keterampilan mengajar, komunikasi, strategi dan keterampilan interpersonal terbentuk dari analisis faktor yang merupakan kombinasi dari subskala kuesioner awal dan kedua faktor ini memiliki reliabilitas yang baik. Kesimpulan: Evaluating Clinical Skillslab Teacher’s Didactical Performance Instrument versi Bahasa Indonesia dapat digunakan sebagai alat untuk mengevaluasi kinerja instruktur laboratorium keterampilan klinik karena memenuhi kaidah validitas dan reliabilitas yang baik walaupun ada faktor yang berubah. Disarankan untuk memeriksa instrumen dalam hal sumber bukti untuk lebih memastikan construct validity.


Background: Clinical skill instructors are the cornerstones of basic clinical skills teaching process. Their role is very important in guiding and facilitating the students to practice clinical skill, facilitating, making sure their skills progress, and preparing them to obtain the predetermined competency. Evaluating Clinical Skillslab Teacher’s Didactical Performance Instrument is developed based on literature review about effective strategies aspects of clinical training (coaching) in skills laboratory, to evaluate clinical skills laboratory instructor’s performance. The aim of this study is to validate Evaluating Clinical Skillslab Teacher’s Didactical Performance Instrument that is adapted into Indonesian. Methode: This study used cross sectional study design and held at FK UPN “Veteran” Jakarta on May 2015 involving 457 students of 2 nd , 4 th , and 6 semester. Respondents completed Evaluating Clinical Skillslab Teacher’s Didactical Performance Instrument questionnaires that had been translated into Indonesian. Data obtained from questionnaires was analyzed to confirm the validity and reliabilty. Result: As many as 387 students were involved in this study (respon rate of 84,68%). There was one item dropped because of its low validity. Two factors are Didactical, Communication, Strategy of skills traning and Interpersonal Skills emerged from the factor analysis and they were combinations of the questionnaire’s former subscales both factors have good reliability. Conclusion: The Indonesian version of Evaluating Clinical Skillslab Teacher’s Didactical Performance Instrument can be used as tool to evaluate clinical skills laboratory instructor’s performance, because it has been proven to have good validity and reliability, although the factors have slightly changed. It is suggested to examine the instrument in regards to other sources of evidence to further confirm the construct validity.