Tesis

Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Bush Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS) Pada Pasien Neurologi = The Validity and Reliability of the Bush–Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS) in Neurological Patients.

Latar Belakang. Bush Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS) merupakan skala penilaian gejala katatonia dengan validitas dan reliabilitas yang baik dalam berbagai bahasa. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melakukan uji validitas dan reliabilitas ke dalam Bahasa Indonesia Metode. Dilakukan translasi dan adaptasi lintas budaya sesuai kaidah WHO, kemudian dilakukan uji validitas dan reliabilitas Bush Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS) dan Bush Francis Catatonia Screening Instrument (BFCSI). Studi potong lintang dilakukan pada populasi pasien neurologi di bangsal rawat inap RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo mulai Februari-Maret 2025. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan metode konsekutif sampling dan total 50 pasien memenuhi kriteria inklusi dan eksklusi. Data karakteristik demografi disajikan dalam bentuk tabel distribusi frekuensi. Semua analisis data menggunakan SPSS versi 25.0 Hasil. Pada uji validitas konkuren BFCRS-Ina dibandingkan dengan SCID-1 (untuk DSM-4) diperoleh nilai Cramer’s V sebesar 0.909. Hasil uji reliabilitas antar pemeriksa menggunakan Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) sebesar 0.893 untuk BFCSI-Ina dan 0.928 untuk BFCRS-Ina dan uji reliabilitas interal menggunakan Cronbach’s Alpha sebesar 0.860 untuk BFCSI-Ina dan 0.850 untuk BFCRS-Ina. Kesimpulan. Skor BFCRS-Ina dan BFCSI-Ina valid dan reliabel untuk menilai gejala katatonia.
Kata Kunci: Uji validitas, uji reliabilitas, Bush Francis Catatonia Rating Scale


Background. Bush Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS) is a tool for assessing catatonia syndrome with good validity and reliability in various languages. This study aims to test the validity and reliability of BFCRS into Indonesian Language. Methods. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation were carried out according to WHO rules. Then we proceed the BFCSI-Ina and BFCRS-Ina validity and reliability tests. A cross-sectional study was conducted on a population of neurology patients at the Neurology ward of RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo starting February-March 2025. Sample collection was carried out using the consecutive sampling method and a total of 50 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Demographic characteristic data is presented in the form of a frequency distribution table. All data analysis used SPSS version 25.0. Results. In the BFCRS-Ina concurrent validity test, compared to SCID-1 for catatonia, the Cramer’s V value was 0.909. The results of the inter-examiner reliability test used an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.893 for BFCSI-Ina and 0.928 for BFCRS-Ina. The internal reliability using Cronbach’s alpha is 0.860 BFCSI-Ina and 0.850 for BFCRS-Ina. Conclusion. The BFCRS-Ina score is valid, reliable and has good accuracy for assessing catatonia.
Keyword: Validity test, reliability test, Bush Francis Catatonia Rating Scale